The Medical Engineers/software for healthcare
We use AI to give your staff their hours back: the note written during the visit, the authorisation that chases itself, the denial already drafted. Built inside the systems you already run, never somewhere else for patient data to live.
01 / solutions
Every one of these is a specific job taken off specific people. We would rather sell you one of them, working, than a platform you have to find a use for.
01
The note drafted while the visit happens and filed in the right place in your EMR, with the clinician signing it rather than a system filing it quietly. We choose the vendor with you, wire the output into the chart, and measure the error rate before it goes near a live clinic.
Ask about thisGives back
The evening documentation session
02
Submission pre-filled from the chart, status polled instead of phoned, payer portals scripted where there is no API, and a person pulled in only when something needs judgement or a peer-to-peer.
Ask about thisGives back
The daily authorisation phone queue
03
Tomorrow's schedule batched through a 270 overnight, the clean ones cleared silently, and only the failures put in front of your front desk with the reason attached.
Ask about thisGives back
Front desk hours, and the denials that follow
04
The 835 parsed, the reason code classified, the appeal drafted from the chart and the payer rules, and the queue ordered by what is actually worth working. Your biller approves and sends.
Ask about thisGives back
The AR follow-up nobody gets to
05
Inbound faxes, referrals and results read, classified, indexed into the chart against the right patient and routed to the right queue. Anything the model is unsure of goes to a person with the page in front of them.
Ask about thisGives back
The fax pile and the scanning tray
06
Replies drafted against your own protocols and templates for a person to approve, recall lists built from the chart rather than a spreadsheet, and reminders that actually reduce no-shows.
Ask about thisGives back
The inbox that never empties
02 / proof
Seen Group runs a healthcare staffing business, The Medical Staffers, and The Medical Engineers builds and operates the software behind it: the public site, the rate engine, the enquiry pipeline into a live operations sheet, and the automations that move a candidate from first message to a working seat.
That is a small thing to have built, and it is worth more to you than a case study you cannot verify. Everything we ask you to trust us with, we run ourselves, on the same standards on this site.
See the system we run03 / healthcare
General agencies learn your compliance requirements at your expense. We would rather know the vocabulary before the first call.
Healthcare software fails in specific ways. An intake form that emails patient details unencrypted. An integration built against a chart export that changes format without notice. An AI feature nobody can audit when a payer asks. A vendor who holds the cloud account and the domain.
We build against HL7 v2 and FHIR, we sign a BAA before we touch anything, and we keep PHI inside your systems rather than copying it into ours. Where a state or a payer restricts how data is handled, we would rather raise it on the first call than have your compliance officer find it later.
04 / how we work
Discovery is fixed cost and the output is yours whether or not we build it. That is a deliberate way to make the first decision cheap.
2 to 5 days
We read the systems, talk to the people doing the work, and write down what is actually happening. You leave with a scope, an architecture outline, a risk list and a price. The document is yours whether or not we build it.
1 to 2 weeks
Data model, integration contracts, screens where screens matter. Agreed before code, because the expensive mistakes are made here rather than in the implementation.
In two-week increments
Working software at the end of every increment, in an environment you can open. No demos assembled the night before, and no six-week silence.
Planned, rehearsed
Migration rehearsed on a copy first, a rollback that has been tested rather than assumed, and a date chosen around your clinic hours rather than ours.
Monthly, or handed over
We keep it running, or we hand it to your team with the documentation and the access to do it themselves. Both are real options and we will tell you which one we think you need.
05 / commercial
01
A defined build with a written scope, a fixed price and a date. Change is handled as a written change, not as an argument at the end.
Best when the outcome is clear
02
An agreed block of engineering time each month for improvements, integrations and support, with a monthly written account of where it went.
Best when the system keeps evolving
03
Named engineers embedded in your team, working to your board and your standards. No layer of account management between you and the people writing the code.
Best when you have your own roadmap
06 / next
Two to five days, fixed cost. You leave with a written scope, an architecture outline, a risk list and a price. The output is yours whether or not we build it.
Start a project07 / contact
Tell us what you are building, or what is failing. An engineer replies, not a form autoresponder.
Meydan Free Zone
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Spring City, PA 19475
United States